Tag: zoning variance

Marketing Efforts / Existing Nonconforming Use Insufficient to Establish Unnecessary Hardship Justifying Use Variance

June 26, 2015 / nancygimbol / 0 Comments

On June 26, 2015, Commonwealth Court again considered what circumstances constitute an “unnecessary hardship” justifying a use variance.

Commonwealth Court Uses the Recent Marshall Decision to Affirm Zoning Hearing Board

May 29, 2015 / nancygimbol / 0 Comments

On May 29, 2015, Commonwealth Court considered whether a mature tree line could constitute a unique physical characteristic for purposes of a dimensional variance analysis.

© 2017 Eastburn and Gray, P.C. All Rights Reserved. The information on this website is for information purposes only. Eastburn and Gray, P.C. provides legal advice to clients only after an attorney-client relationship has been established by written agreement. The communication of information on this site does not and is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. Any electronic or other communication sent to Eastburn and Gray, P.C. through this website is not privileged and confidential unless the sender is a current client of Eastburn and Gray, P.C. and the communication is based on that attorney-client relationship.

Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑

Tag: zoning variance

Marketing Efforts / Existing Nonconforming Use Insufficient to Establish Unnecessary Hardship Justifying Use Variance

Commonwealth Court Uses the Recent Marshall Decision to Affirm Zoning Hearing Board

Published By:

Archives

Social Media

Tweets by @PAZoningLawyers